Talk:Freedom of panorama

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 20 March 2014, Freedom of panorama was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Lotte world tower (censored).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kansas City Montage.jpg[edit]

The photo of the Nelson Museum of Art in Kansas City (File:Nelson-art-gallery1.jpg) was deleted, because it contained the "unfree sculpture by Oldenburg" (the giant shuttlecock), similar to File:Nelson Museum of Art Courtyard.jpg. That giant shuttlecock is a minor portion of the image, and I would think that "Freedom of panorama" should apply. An image of the giant shuttlecock alone is protected, but here it's only a minor portion of a large image.

Secondly, I don't know how to find the discussion accompanying that deletion: Was there any discussion of freedom of panorama? If no, I think this is a case of excessive and counterproductive hypervigilance. Comments? Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number of images[edit]

The article currently has 17 uncensored images and 5 censored. How many of each are needed to make the points intended? Fewer, I would suggest. 2601:642:4600:3F80:751C:58D8:4FB4:6697 (talk) 23:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]