Talk:Freeze-dried ice cream
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article says it is 'still used today'. Does that mean it's still in use by NASA, or just sold in gift shops and the like?
You can't use a term to define the term itself
[edit]Really, Fotaun? Couldn't think of a better way to describe Freeze Dried Ice Cream other than "Ice Cream that has been freeze-dried"? _________________________________________________ Ummm...how else would YOU describe it? Why not make an edit, if you don't like the way it was described, and think you can do a better job? 108.231.42.28 (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
It was used by a shuttle crew a few missions ago!
[edit]AStronaut Ice Cream was taken on a shuttle mission 2 years ago. While it is not taken on every mission certain astronauts do like the product and request it.
- Source? Jasont82 14:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasont82 (talk • contribs)
Taste and texture
[edit]The writing quality is very amateur and pathetic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.19.15.219 (talk) 23:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
extremely high in calories
[edit]i once bought some of this stuff and ate it all. it was about the size of a small granolla bar, and then i looked at the nutrition information and found out i'd eaten something like a thousand calories. i'm not saying the stuff is bad. far from it; it's delicious. i just think that part is worth mentioning. that is if memory serves and i'm right.
245 calories, I believe...They've toned down the recipe.
On the the back of the package I'm eating now it says 110 --Edwardsdl (talk) 05:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Making fast edit
[edit]Since coming across something similar in AfD, I noticed in this article that the top paragraph notes that "Astronaut Ice Cream" is a trademark. The last paragraph read (until my edit a moment from now,) "Astonaut Ice Cream..." It should be "Freeze-dried ice cream," the edit I will make momentarily. LaughingVulcan 00:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Still being made
[edit]This product is produced by Oregon Freeze-Dry, based in Albany, OR. The article mentions that the process takes hours - when I worked at OFD, freeze-dried ice cream took the longest chamber time, at roughly 32 hours.
Sschlimgen 02:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Not real ice cream?
[edit]In the article, it says, "Skylab had a refrigerator that was used for real ice cream, and occasionally Space Shuttle and International Space Station astronauts have enjoyed real ice cream." Is it not real ice cream? Is it because it's not creamy? If freeze-dried ice cream is really real ice cream, then calling the wet stuff "real ice cream" isn't very specific. It seems like ice cream but just freeze-dried. - Wuffyz 05:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
This is all false. All of it.
[edit]Cunningham himself has said they never had this stuff, and it was never developed by "whirlpool" they are a appliance maker, not a food producer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.103.200.71 (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Vox made a video about this [1]. Sizeofint (talk) 02:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Whirlpool did develop products from NASA: "We continued working with the government to develop food and equipment for space travel, pioneering the development of food, waste management and personal hygiene systems used in all of NASA’s Gemini, Apollo and Skylab missions." [1] 2602:304:CDDD:5B00:156F:3B80:5857:316F (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
By 1972, astronauts also ate classic ice cream on the Skylab space station
[edit]Interesting, since Wikipedia (q.v.) says that Skylab didn't launch till 1973. 108.231.42.28 (talk) 20:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Freeze-dried ice cream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061013165946/http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/lsda_data/nra_research_data/1994_space_food.pdf to http://lsda.jsc.nasa.gov/lsda_data/nra_research_data/1994_space_food.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110127145643/http://www.universetoday.com/62600/astronaut-ice-cream/ to http://www.universetoday.com/62600/astronaut-ice-cream/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)