Talk:French battleship Vergniaud
Appearance
![]() | French battleship Vergniaud has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | French battleship Vergniaud is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Vergniaud/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
[edit]- No issues
Lead
[edit]- No issues
Design and description
[edit]- No issues
Career
[edit]- Fix disambiguation issue with "naval review" according to this
- The definition's on the disambig page, about halfway down. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Legacy
[edit]- Since there is only one sentence in this section, I would get rid of this section and put the information in the "Postwar career" subsection
- Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]- No issues
Bibliography
[edit]- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 00:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Battleships of France good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Operation Majestic Titan articles
- Operation Majestic Titan articles
- GA-Class Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- GA-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages