Talk:French cruiser Lalande

French cruiser Lalande has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

French cruiser Lalande is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 22, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
October 19, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Lalande/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

1. Prose On hold

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous On hold

Comments[edit]

1.

Consider linking reserve in the lead to Reserve fleet where you're talking about the ship status, not the specific fleet
- Done
"and she had provisions to carry up to 150 naval mines" - Maybe it's an English variant thing, but provisions seems really weird to me in this context
- Switched to "capacity"

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Add a short description
- Doesn't Wikidata do that automatically? I confess I don't know much about Wikidata or short descriptions, though.
  - Wikidata item is under a different title and is not linked to this article. [1]. I'll go ahead and add it manually here.
Consider adding alt text for the images. It's not a requirement for GA-status but helps with accessibility/screen readers and is often asked for in ACR and FAC.
- Added one for the lead image, but I don't know what exactly is useful info for the map. Any ideas?
  - Not sure. Since it's not a requirement for GA, that can just be left alone. Hog Farm (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. This article is in really good shape. The two points under 7. aren't mandatory, but are things that would be helpful additions to the article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for another review! Parsecboy (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]