Talk:French submarine Charles Brun

French submarine Charles Brun has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 31, 2023. (Reviewed version).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:French submarine Charles Brun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 03:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review[edit]

I plan to review this. There is only one issue that I can see at the moment. If that's the only one that I can find, I'll correct it myself and assess as GA. Djmaschek (talk) 03:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! And thanks in advance.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review1[edit]

@Sturmvogel 66: GA class. Normally I require the nominator to make every fix, no matter how small, but I only saw three issues, of which I fixed two. Please look at the last bullet point. I'm not sure if it needs to be fixed, so I'll leave it up to you. Djmaschek (talk) 04:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background: Add "it" after 212C.
Description: Conversion of 360 metric tons to 356 long tons was different in the infobox and text (360:350). I added a 0 to the text formula. If this needs to be backed out, please do so.
Description: I tried to do the same for the installed power 1,300 ihp to 969 kW. Then I noticed one was horsepower and the other was metric hp, so I backed out that edit. Please check this one.
- Done. I should have been using PS throughout.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]