Talk:Friedrichshafen D.I

Friedrichshafen D.I has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 6, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 22:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Friedrichshafen D.I/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 22:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this shortly. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 22:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Three sources are listed in the 'Bibliography', but "Borzutzki, Siegfried (1993)" doesn't appear to be used.
Otherwise, the sources are presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
The sources appear to be from high-quality, reliable sources.
Unable to carry out spotchecks due to offline sources, but nominator is a trusted, well-established editor.
A quick Google books search reveals little This source suggests only one plane was built, while this one doesn't add anything more than what is already in the article.

Images[edit]

Only one image is used, in the infobox. The image has a suitable license and caption.
Consider adding alt text, but this is not a GA requirement.

Prose[edit]

"The Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen, after having.." For clarity, perhaps expand this to: "The Flugzeugbau Friedrichshafen aircraft manufacturing company, after having.."
"..to the German Army's (Deutsches Heer Inspectorate of Flying Troops (Inspektion der Fliegertruppen) (Idflieg))." I got a bit confused with the brackets here. It feels like it should be "..to the German Army's (Deutsches Heer) Inspectorate of Flying Troops (Inspektion der Fliegertruppen) (Idflieg)."
"..while the second one had ones that.." The repeated "one"/"ones" here is a little clunky. I think the first could be removed.

Otherwise there isn't much to say about this short, neat article. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 15:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, the changes look good. Confirming the article is neutral and stable, and so meets all the GA criteria. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 22:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.