Talk:Fritchley Tunnel

A fact from Fritchley Tunnel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Fritchley Tunnel is believed to be the oldest surviving railway tunnel in the world?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fritchley Tunnel.

Wikipedia

Derbyshire Mid‑importance

The article on Fritchley Tunnel is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Derbyshire may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

grade rating

Note: two sources appear to clash on the grade rating, if any, of this bridge: the Derby Telegraph says this is Grade II listed: the English Heritage register entry says no grade level applies to this case. I've gone with the Derby Telegraph because it's a secondary source, per standard procedure. But which is right? -- The Anome (talk) 10:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating this, I was about to. I've seen grade II listed mentioned in the press too, but according to [1], as well as the source in the article, it is actually a scheduled monument. It might well be both, with the press coverage relating to the more recent listing. Nice to get this to DYK, if it could be expanded to meet the minimum size. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated it at DYK: Template:Did you know nominations/Fritchley Tunnel. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've also recategorized the article to reflect its status as a scheduled ancient monument, instead of a listed building. -- The Anome (talk) 12:54, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fritchley Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141216221013/http://butterleygangroadproject.com/ to http://butterleygangroadproject.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]