Talk:Full on

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Psychedelic_trance#Full-on]] The anchor (#Full-on) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

Next to Astrix, who has a cross-over style, I don't believe full-on is anywhere close to uplifting trance. It is commercialized though, but still mainly underground which is why it does well. Some of the artists I am thinking of consist of The Misted Muppet, Sesto Sento, Vibe Tribe, Menog, etc. They have a solid background and track record IMO. --HotshotGG 4:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Full on is not equal to melodic psytrance, its soooo way wrong. Full on means: rolling bassline, dancefloor-friendly structure and of course has a tendency to be more acceptable to general public. There's japanese full on like Theoreme, which has almost nothing to do with melodies. On the other head, pure goa trance, like Filteria is hugely melodic, it's built on layers of melodies. I think we should remove this article altogether and write a new one, describing what the term Full On really refers to. Thanks :-) / ilyabirman

Article name[edit]

"Full on" is too non-specific. Even if correct, it should be Full on (music) or something. The proposed move is not uncontroversial. -- Beardo 00:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what do you want? Psychomelodic User:Psychomelodic/me 23:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]