Talk:Fullerton Transportation Center

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Union Pacific station vs. other one

I have multiple pics ready to upload of both stations, which are both listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Not sure if one or two separate articles should be created, or if i should create two sections for the two NRHP-listed stations, in this article. doncram (talk) 03:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have one for the Union Pacific Depot, load it up anyway. It could be used as a supplemental pic, plus it would replace the duplicate pic on the NRHP in Orange County list. ----DanTD (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overloaded infobox

The infobox is unnecessarily long and overloaded. There is only one address for the Transportation Center - the other one is a restaurant. The "line" information is redundant since exactly the same information is show under "services". The AT&SF info under services is useless since it does not provide proper succession - which is the main funcion of a succession template. That should be covered by the story within the body of the article. Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I was under the impression the entire transportation center included both old stations. ----DanTD (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C'mon now! That is what the article and references say and if you go to the website for The Old Spaghetti Factory you will find a restaurant at 100 East Santa Fe Avenue, in the relocated building. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amtrack #4

WHO KEEPS CHANGING THE INFORMATION ON AMTRAK #4???? I HAVE PUT IN MULITPLE TIMES THAT #4 IS ON TRACK NUMBER ONE!!! YET SOMEONE KEEPS CHANGING IT!!! STOP CHANGING IT!!!! TRAIN FOUR USES TRACK ONE (YES GOING EAST BOUND)!!! #4 is routed thru Fullerton on track ONE because it is easier to load all the baggage without having to take it across the tracks. (Also there is a (timetable) westbound Metrolink that often arrives while #4 is in the station. PLEASE STOP CHANGING THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Eastbound Southwest Chief uses track ONE!

The Eastbound Southwest Chief uses track number ONE! Please stop changing it to indicate it uses track three. It does NOT use track three.

Please stop changing the track for Number 4. It uses track one. I have pointed this out several times now. PLEASE stop changing it!!!

eom

Hi there. Please sign your posts on talk pages, cite your sources, and remember to be civil. It appears your edits have been breaking the template used in the article. On Wikipedia, we use the Be bold, revert, discuss cycle as a process to achieve consensus on changes to articles. Could you explain exactly what you are trying to change? Thanks. --Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 21:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Train 4

Train 4 uses track ONE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonymissOC (talk • contribs) 20:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antrak #4 coming into Fullerton...on track ONE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUlRwrQVM2U

Another video of Amtrak #4 coming in on track ONE

http://wn.com/onboard_amtrak's_southwest_chief_as_it_departs_fullerton,_ca — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonymissOC (talk • contribs) 20:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just keep changing it to the wrong information. I'll just keep changing it back to the correct information.

Southwest Chief uses track one in BOTH directions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonymissOC (talk • contribs) 03:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, edit warring as you are suggesting is prohibited. Please cease your disruptive edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 20:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fullerton Transportation Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130926141305/http://www.scrpa.net:80/scrrdays.htm to http://www.scrpa.net/scrrdays.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To James.

I'm sorry. I'm not trying to edit war. I have seen #4 many times, because I live near there. With very rare exceptions, it uses track #1. I don't know how to provide sources, since I am the source. I am not trying to edit war or cause disruption. I'm just trying to ensure that the information is correct, and I'm sorry about breaking the template. What other information would you like me to provide? AnonymissOC (talk) 23:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You must provide a reliable source for your assertions. Further information can be found at this link: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. --Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 00:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]