Talk:Fulvous whistling duck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleFulvous whistling duck is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 26, 2018.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Dendrocygna bicolor wilhelma.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 22, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-07-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 22:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fulvous Whistling Duck
The Fulvous Whistling Duck (Dendrocygna bicolor) is a whistling duck which breeds across the world's tropical regions. It is a common species, growing to about 48–53 cm (19–21 in) long. Its habitat is still freshwater lakes, paddy fields or reservoirs with plentiful vegetation, where it feeds mainly at night on seeds and other parts of plants.Photo: Branko Kannenberg

Comments from Crisco[edit]

Hi Jim, sorry it took me so long to get back to you on this... had a bout of the flu.

  • Dendrocygna is derived from the Ancient Greek dendron ... - Except you just mentioned the initial name as Anas bicolor, and have not discussed dendrocygna yet
  • maximum known age is 6·5 years - ? Do you mean 6.5 or 5 to 6?

Very ready for GAC, although I am not familiar enough with the topic area to talk about FAC. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In Popular Culture section suggestion[edit]

This specific species is mentioned somewhat at length in an episode of Stargate SG-1. Not sure if this is significant enough. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Recap/StargateSG1S10E5Uninvited — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.9.218.11 (talk) 17:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested moves[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. All but this one have already been moved by Materialscientist. --BDD (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– Invert the redirections as the consensus and guidelines recommend not to capitalise the common (vernacular) names of species. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms. Coreyemotela (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Several of these have already been done with no difficultly.--67.70.140.89 (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fulvous whistling duck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Category: Breeds of Ducks reverted[edit]

I noted that this page did not have the category Breeds of Ducks that is present on other Duck pages and added it. I note that the category was removed. Might there be a reason why? Should that category be removed from the other Duck pages? Tigey (talk) 09:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because Category:Duck_breeds is for domesticated and human-selected "breeds" - this is a wild species that is not kept by poulterers/duck-breeders/duck-farmers. Shyamal (talk) 09:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]