Talk:Functional integration (neurobiology)

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Student assignment

Is there a cite for this? "How Brains Make up Their Minds" by Walter Freeman? Anyone?

I got my conception of Functional Integration from some of Karl Friston's reviews. Anishpotnis (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, hi. I'm working on this page as part of an assignment for an introductory neuroscience class at my college. I'm aware of the existence of a few scholarpedia articles on similar topics, but I thought there existed a niche here for a somewhat less dense discussion on how medical imaging data is collected/analyzed/used.

Anishpotnis (talk) 23:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citation you asked for

Freeman, Walter J. (2000). How brains make up their mind. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-12008-1. OCLC 222752784.

You will need to copy the edit version and delete all of the <>! and -- . Hope this helps dolfrog (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi, a reference to an article just giving the title and "Nature 2008" is not very useful, given the fact that Nature has 52 issues/year. If you use the {{cite journal}} and {{cite web}} templates, we have bots that can fill in the rest (and add DOIs and such, so that there's a clickable link leading directly to the article cited). Hope this helps. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 11:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello randy, I updated my references, adding clickable links to all articles indexed by pubmed. Anishpotnis (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further on referencing: there are quite a lot unsourced statements in the article. And some that are sourced but wrongly so: at one point it is mentioned that a study was "well designed". Such praise has to be sourced independently, but the only source given is to this study itself. Please note that everything you say must be sourced... --Randykitty (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]