Jump to content

Talk:Functionality (chemistry)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 2 May 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Functionality (chemistry)Functionality – Current title has unnecessary disambiguation. The target is a somewhat dubious redirect. Laurdecl talk 06:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And what is? We have no other articles on "Functionality", so this is by default the primary article. Or do you think a redirect to "Function" is better? The word may be common, but this isn't a dictionary, and we should select the primary encyclopedic topic. Laurdecl talk 06:57, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't one. It's therefore fine as it is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is only one article titled "Functionality", therefore it is de facto primary. Per WP:ATDAB, the disambiguation in the title and unnecessary and should be removed. Laurdecl talk 02:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I also do not really agree with the moving. Certainly at some point a appropriate disambiguation page will be created. I think the redirect to Function is appropriate for most readers, but I would suggest to place at a prominent position on the page Function a link to Functionality (chemistry). --Minihaa (talk)
There will be no disambiguation page because there is nothing to disambiguate. We have only one article on "Functionality". We could put a hatnote on this page with a link to "Function". Laurdecl talk 02:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

FUNCTIONALITY

[edit]

The no. of bonding site in a monomer, is referred to as it's functionality.

    H   H              H   H
    |   |              |   |
    C = C  ------->...-C = C-..
    |   |              |   |
    H   H              H   H
  
Thus , ethylene is considered to be bifunctional.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuldeepokroy (talkcontribs) 07:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]