Talk:Funk, Nebraska
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Postmark photo
[edit]I've removed a photo of a Funk postmark from this article.
There are certainly situations in which we'd want to use a photo of a postmark—for example, a holiday cancellation for Valentine, Nebraska or Santa Claus, Indiana, or a first-day cancellation on a stamp commemorating a local resident, historical event, etc.
This is not the case here: the photo depicts an everyday postmark. Apart from the town's name and ZIP Code, there's nothing about it particular to Funk. It doesn't reflect the town's size, economic vitality, local geography, or anything else of interest to encyclopedia readers. Ammodramus (talk) 23:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ergo, you speak for all readers of Wikipedia? Thats incredible. I know so much more, I mean the volumes data obtained by looking at grain silos, WHOAHCoal town guy (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete it, remove it. I think that the photo of grain silos is far more powerful in granting veracity to a town than postmark which would prove, in a true encyclopedic manner that the place existed, BUT WOW bring on the pics of a grain silo, thats far more telling. JUST remember that when that place disappears and people ask for some sort of veracity, and all you have are grain silo photos, I am sure that will carry all the weight in the worldCoal town guy (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Funk, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fpopest%2Fdata%2Fcities%2Ftotals%2F2012%2FSUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/699nOulzi?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html - Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)