Talk:G-On Riders

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AniDB, Animesuki, and AnimeNfo links[edit]

AnimeSuki has been found not to violate WP:C, which is why a link to its main page is on wiki. Both AniDB and AnimeNfo contain factual information that can't simply be copy pasted into the article and aren't ads, so they pass WP:EL. Therefore, all three links should be included in the article. Buspar (talk) 00:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 3 websites promote and direct to copyright violating files, so as per Wikipedia:External_links#Restrictions_on_linking they are removed.Folken de Fanel (talk) 01:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're stated justification was "Material that violates the copyrights of others per contributors' rights and obligations should not be linked." Sites that index torrents have been found not to violate the copyrights of others, per recent court cases. Had I linked directly to a fansub group, then you'd have a point. Once again, your interpretation of policy is incorrect. The links are restored. Buspar (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since when do courts define or limit the rules of WP ? If it's the decision of WP of not allowing any website involved in the distribution of copyrighted works, there's nothing to add.

By the way, concerning your newest edit summary, you had already violated the 3RR rule.Folken de Fanel (talk) 09:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Count again. I only reverted your edits 3 times then stopped. You did four. Buspar (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering you've violated WP's rules and ignored previous discussions and consensuses against you, you have nothing to boast about.Folken de Fanel (talk) 10:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]