Talk:GMK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 18 April 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 21:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GMKGMK (disambiguation)Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack is the primary topic. Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=GMK for March '23 says there were 140 views of the list, and 16 clicks went to that page (~11%). You need to make an actual argument for primary topic based on the linked guideline, not merely assert it. --Joy (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack is the only page in the "Outgoing Pageviews" section on the WikiNav page meaning that it appears to indefinitely be the primary topic (to me). Eiga-Kevin2 (talk) 11:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It just means that it was the only topic that gathered a combination of input and output clicks that is over 10 in volume and can be rendered. Even if we actually thought that no other links were ever clicked on the list, none at all, the overall ratio is still very small. This could mean that people are looking for some other undocumented GMK meaning and not finding it. It could also mean that they're content seeing just the list. For a topic to be primary, it needs to be sought more often than everything else, and there is no evidence here for that. --Joy (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unlikely to be the primary topic with respect, given the large number of meanings and the relatively rare use as an abbreviation for the film title. As for the Wikinav data: the link to the film got 16 clicks, which is more than any other link present on the dab page at the time (it has since been expanded), but significantly less than the total views of the dab (links with fewer than 10 clicks don't make it into the dataset). – Uanfala (talk) 11:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.