Talk:GMT Games

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GMT Games article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Board and table games Mid‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal[edit]

Here I Stand (boardgame) does not seem to meet WP:GNG on its own. I propose we merge it's info into the article.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does have some independent reception commentary from Hobby Games: The 100 Best, and better than that it won a Charles S. Roberts Award. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Charles S. Roberts Award is the preeminent wargaming award. That alone should confer notability though nothing is a sure thing. Also won the 2006 Walter Luc Haas Best Simulation. Recommend no merger. -- GreenC 01:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Doesn't meet the GNG? Maybe hard to find because the primary title search is easy to confuse with the original quote from whence it was derived. Jclemens (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should not merge into this article, which is about the company GMT. Adding discussion of individual games would just overwhelm the article. Or are you proposing just adding the title to the list of titles? I which case I don't really care, other than to say the list of titles itself will quickly become uwieldly and might be better handled by just linking to GMT's homepage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.166.157.67 (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]