Talk:GVB (Amsterdam)

Trains: Rapid transit / Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Amsterdam Metro#North/South Line|North/South line]] The anchor (#North/South Line) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Map[edit]

Replaced the old map by a new one. Hope y'all like it! Alargule 19:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo gvb.gif[edit]

Image:Logo gvb.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gemeentelijk Vervoerbedrijf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130710182046/http://en.gvb.nl/pages/home.aspx to http://en.gvb.nl/pages/home.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 June 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved as requested. (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gemeente Vervoerbedrijf → GVB (Amsterdam) – As the article already describes, the company has been called GVB for at least 20 years. In addition to not being the official name, it is also not the WP:COMMONNAME. I would be happy to provide some documentation for this, but I think anyone who has been to the city knows that it is referred to as 'GVB' or 'het/de GVB' in practice. The origin of this name should, in my opinion, be mentioned in the history section, or perhaps mentioned in the lead. David12345 (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This would match the practice at the German and Dutch Wikipedias. Mackensen (talk) 11:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as proposed. It is neither an Amsterdam nor in Amsterdam. I suggest GVB (transport company). -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using (*locale*) to describe the area being served by a transport company is a very, very common practice throughout Wikipedia. The company is located in Amsterdam, its headquarters are in the Sloterdijk area. The company is owned by the municipal government. What more do you need? David12345 (talk) 04:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.