Talk:Gaganyaan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:Manned-Mission-Chart.jpg[edit]

The image File:Manned-Mission-Chart.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aspect ratio[edit]

ISRO_Orbital_Vehicle.jpg has wrong aspect ratio. The image should be wider. 67.194.195.186 (talk) 06:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Total pressurized volume?[edit]

If anybody has a number (with reliable source) for the total pressurized volume of the ISRO Orbital Vehicle, it would be fabulous if you add it to the article! --Tony Mach (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ISRO Orbital Vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. —Gazoth (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move 15 August 2018[edit]

ISRO Orbital VehicleGaganyaan – See many sources (https://www.google.co.in/search?q=Gaganyaan&rlz=1C5CHFA_enIN797IN797&oq=Gaganyaan&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8). Indian Prime Minister has announced the name. Jay ❯❯❯ Talk 14:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, the news sources are clear this is ISRO's orbital vehicle. This is a non-controversial move. This article can be named simply "Gaganyaan", when compared with other orbital vehicles such as Dragon, Dragon 2, Orion, Shenzhou, Soyuz, etc. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 16:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Rowan Forest Thanks, I have made the change.-- Jay ❯❯❯ Talk 17:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, all is left now is for you close the move request. I'll take care of some redirects, Thanks! Rowan Forest (talk) 17:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article should be renamed to ISRO Orbital Vehicle[edit]

Article talks about the a particular vehicle not a mission. Gaganyaan is the name of one mission planned for 2022 or before. Either a new article Gaganyaan should be created OR ISRO Orbital Vehicle development sections should be moved to the Indian Human Spaceflight Programme article. For example, Chandrayaan was a mission which used 11 payloads. Gaganyaan will be a mission which will carry one payload called ISRO orbital vehicle. Gaganyaan article should start with launch, operation and ending of the Gaganyaan mission and little about what other missions such as Re-entry test. Reentry test should be part of ISRO orbital vehicle or Indian Human Spaceflight Programme article. (Posted by user:Knowshare1)

  • oppose, Gaganyaan is not a mission. Gagan means sky and yaan means craft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayprakash12345 (talkcontribs) 08:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the article is about the Gaganyaan spacecraft, named so by ISRO. Whenever it is sent on a mission(s) we will write about its flight and its outcomes. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, Article is about the vehicle. Same orbital vehicle will be used in the TestFlight 01 and TestFlight 02, along with for Gaganyaan(mission). So, naming the article Gaganyaan is wrong, which is a mission name. There can be multiple orbital vehicle, but only one Gaganyaan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowshare1 (talkcontribs) 06:04, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: The official page for Gaganyaan clearly states: "Gaganyaan (Orbital Vehicle) is an Indian crewed orbital spacecraft intended to be the basis of the Indian Human Spaceflight Programme." It does not say Gaganyaan is "a mission" but "a spacecraft". Are we done yet? Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soyuz-shaped capsule[edit]

An IP just deleted all mention to the Russian collaboration except for astronaut training. That is not OK, as Russia's assistance has been going on for decades, and its assistance does not diminish ISRO's achievements. Also, stating that Gaganyaan shows a "Soyuz shape" does not mean nor suggest it is a derivative of Soyuz, but while lacking pictures, it is what best describes its shape -per the sources quoted. Rowan Forest (talk) 00:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Telugu[edit]

Voice a concern 43.230.212.213 (talk) 13:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reuse[edit]

Is there a reliable source indicating whether the capsule is intended to be reusable? The article would also be improved by mentioning the service module is detached and expended and prior to re-entry. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 22:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Separate page[edit]

hello, just a doubt, does anyone else think that the testing and development has gotten a bit more detail oriented? I think a seperate page could be made for it as well as including some test launches.
Like a page titled Development of Gaganyaan and saying things like how it was made and how it was tested before it's flights.
can I have others opinion on this? Thanks RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]