Talk:Gajanan Maharaj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

section on origin[edit]

This section is too long and sounds more definitive than it should be. Seek clarification: Did Shri Gajanan Maharaj travel to Nasik in 1887 (after he came to Shegaon in 1878)? is the question about his origin settled? I do not think so. Every devotee is entitled to hold their opinion because the question is not settled. That does not change anyone'e devotion to the saint.Tkul (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)tkul[reply]

Untitled[edit]

I think this page needs a good picture of the saint. (--Mayuresh Kadu (India) 23:30, 19 August 2005 (UTC))[reply]

samadhi[edit]

The word samadhi needs to be linked to the relevent article on this website. Also, need to distinguish this from the samadhi that some other saints took.Tkul A lot has been added to this article about early days of Shri Gajanan maharaj without citing the references. Can the editors please cite the references? Tkul (talk) 03:30, 1 August 2010 (UTC)tkul[reply]

Chronology[edit]

There is no chronology in the article

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC) "he allegedly performed many miracles, such as giving a fresh lease on life to one Janrao Deshmukh, lighting the clay-pipe without fire, filling a dry well with water, drawing sugar cane juice by twisting canes with his hands, and curing leprosy of a woman. He wore very little clothes. He attained Mahasamadhi on 8 September, 1910."[reply]


Criticism[edit]

The criticism section is unwarranted. If you wish to retain this, please add the section of every revered religious figure in history, for this vague comment can be made on all of them. If not, please remove the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suvarnatejas (talkcontribs) 00:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

  Please change the work charlatan to saint in the above paragraph of the article. Thanks.

Ravi krchandra@ncs.com.sg

Hi,

  charlatans claim to perform miracles like above. So let it remain like that.

Hutom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.172 (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gajanan Maharaj never spoke a word during his life time, His so called divine power is based on assumption that he has performed the so called miracles detailed in the Pothis. Gajanan Sansthan is doing a good work but no doubt there was nothing divine about Gajanan maharaj. He has not done any work comparable with the revered saints like Saint Dnyaneshwar, Saint Tukaram & various others. There are claims that he had met Lokmanya Tilak but this has not been historically proven. Although we still see painting of Gajanan Maharaj with Lokmanya Tilak at the temple in shegaon. Criticism section would certainly help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.191.35.24 (talk) 10:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TOC[edit]

I am classifying the article so as to create a Table of contents. Abhilash Mhaisne (talk) 17:18, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, I propose creation of a separate article for the Sansthan, as it is a social and religious institution drawing visitors from all over India. Help me create the article, leave a message on my talk page. canaar (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gajanan Maharaj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gajanan Maharaj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]