Talk:Galulatherium

Galulatherium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 23, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 5, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the fragmentary fossil jaw TNM 02067 may represent the only known mainland African member of the enigmatic Gondwanatheria?

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Tanzania Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tanzania portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tanzania (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:TNM 02067/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ucucha, I've signed up to review this article on a bone fragment. Comments in a day or two. Sasata (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Ucucha 16:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good-only a few minor suggestions:

suggest adding dates for the geological eras on first usage (at least in the lead)
- Added in the lead.
"In 2007, Stevens and colleagues" perhaps give his full name, to be consistent with "David Krause" earlier
- Nancy.
"It preserves much of the body," I'm not sure what this means
- Clarified, I hope.
"…all of which are known from the Cenozoic, less than 65 million years ago, only." It's somewhat awkward to have that "only" stuck at the end of the sentence as a clause by itself.
- Moved "only" up a few words.

Everything in order, promoting now. Sasata (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]