Talk:Ganagapura

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Too many unexplained terms[edit]

I've tried to go through this interesting article and rewrite it, both to improve the English and to clarify things for non-Hindu readers. However, as a non-Hindu reader myself, I could only do so much. There are a number of unexplained terms that I didn't feel competent to research and clarify, and that badly need to be explained. Ammodramus (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

important website link reverted[edit]

User Pujariankur had updated the page with many details like Accommodation at Ganagapur Pilgrimage place and Pooja or Worship at the Temple. The User added Contact and Website fields but they are no more now as they have been reverted. I think the Contact 9035479569 / 9035352133 and the website www.srikshetraganagapur.com are authentic cum Most Useful and hence be added back. Hope i find them back soon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dattamaharaja (talkcontribs) 18:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a medium for advertising. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 11:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ganagapura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How many citations are needed to remove the additional verification tags[edit]

I wish to add authentic sources to improve this article Dongar Kathorekar (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]