Jump to content

Talk:Garry Schyman/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Article is well written and complies to MoS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References appear to comply to WP:RS and all major statements are properly cited.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    The article appears to be stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Unfortunately there are no images available, however, this is not a requirement of GA.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Summary: There are no issues with this article, and it passes all the requirements on the checklist. As such, I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. -- S Masters (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]