Talk:Gaustad (station)

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Nonsense?[edit]

A sentence in the article currently reads: "Many people leaving along Line 1 alight at Gaustad to come to Ullevaal Stadion although Ullevaal Stadion has its own station." Firstly, I don't understand the word alight in this sentence, but it appears to be stating that many people going to Ullevål Stadion take Line 1 and debark at Gaustad. I doubt this as it's a pretty long walk from Gaustad to Ullevål Stadion, more than 1 km. I'm sure that when there's a match at Ullevål with a capacity crowd of 25,000 there's a steady trickle of pedestrians from Gaustad, however, in the absence of some corroborating evidence I suggest this sentence is removed. __meco (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been removed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 19:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gaustad (station). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.akersposten.no/nyheter/kongen-mott-av-demonstranter-1.5865896
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article3900476.ece
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160310072643/https://ruter.no/globalassets/rutetabeller/oslo/t-banen-linjekart-03042016.pdf to https://ruter.no/globalassets/rutetabeller/oslo/t-banen-linjekart-03042016.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150315120515/http://www.sporveien.com/ikbViewer/page/inter/omktp?p_document_id=34274 to http://www.sporveien.com/ikbViewer/page/inter/omktp?p_document_id=34274

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]