Talk:Gavia Pass

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I removed this section because it was non-encyclopedic (use of 2nd person pronoun). The recommendation is really more suitable for WikiTravel. It's not clear also whether the intent of "strict restrictions" is to mean laws or practical restrictions.

RosinDebow 06:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll agree with the style not being quite right. But this is useful information and should be recorded. I can't remember the details of the restrictions (I was in a car, so was unaffected), but yes, they are legal (certainly no lorries, probably no camper vans either). jodastephen 11:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Practicalities[edit]

The Gavia Pass is one of Europe's highest and most remote road passes. If you just want to get from Bormio to Ponte di Legno then you should probably go via Aprica. Much of the pass is single track, and as such there are strict restrictions on allowed vehicle type. Realistically, only cars or smaller can attempt the pass.

Suitability[edit]

There seems to be no place to put this but here. The Bicycling.com link is stale. Having said that, the Wikipedia project while attempting to bring order out of chaos seems to be something that should probably be brought to an end. It has replaced the monopoly of the press and mass-media with the monopoly of pin-heads that are such sticklers that they don't care enough about just editing in changes for what doesn't meet their picayune standards. Don't comment about it - just change it if it provides useful information. If it doesn't provide useful information, delete the article. Personally, what I wanted was a zeroed in map of the actual pass itself plus something that shows its location better. It would also be nice to know if it actually exists for some other reason than bicycle races. A map showing how it connects on both sides does wonders in showing information like this. hhhobbit (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]