Talk:Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Future expansion[edit]

  • The background section should be beefed up with information on the state of LGBT rights in the US in the 1970s/early 1980s.
  • Mention should also be made of Baker v. Wade, which overturned the Texas sodomy law (later reinstated, now overturned by Surpreme Court)
  • Need some information on the state of LGBT relations and the student organization at A&M as a result of the ruling.

Karanacs (talk) 19:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Background and the aftereffects, I concur, need to be beefed up, but how does Baker v. Wade pertain to this subject? BTW, interesting court case about A&M of which I was unaware. — BQZip01 — talk 04:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I saw a mention somewhere that Baker v. Wade happened while this court case was ongoing (thus probably killing the university's argument that the club couldn't exist because it promoted an illegal activity), but there weren't enough details in my source to include it yet. I had never heard of this either, and was surprised to find out that this is how A&M ended up with fraternities. Karanacs (talk) 14:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As long as it is linked to this and that link is specified, I have no problem with such an addition. — BQZip01 — talk 16:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Accuracy in Terminology and Ideation[edit]

  • Care needs to be taken not to ascribe current so-called GLBT (or LGBT) terminology and ideology to the actual issues in play at the time the events occurred. Specifically, the GSS charter and the related legal case, along with the other court cases alluded to in this article, had nothing to do with bi-sexual or transgender issues, nor did they even point out 'lesbian' issues as somehow separate from 'gay' issues. It would be historically innacurate (though, perhaps very 'pc' within the LGBT community today), to indicate that the actors involved on either side of the GSS vs. A&M case (lawyers, activists, students, etc.) thought that they were talking about the rights of any minority groups other than homosexuals.

MEastman (talk) 21:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]