Talk:Generalized method of moments

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The statement that GMM is consistent for any positive semidefinite W is kind of strange. It should probably be any positively semidefinite W, where condition 2 applies or something like that. David Vonka (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "This article may be too technical for most readers to understand" may be irrelevant, may be redundant, and may be in need of deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.128.80.4 (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The link to Idempotence leads to a link for a different page - Projection (linear algebra) - although there is a link there that goes on to Idempotence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.176.55 (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Santos Silva's comment on this article[edit]

Dr. Santos Silva has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

This is generally good. Maybe I would omit the proof of the optimal weighting matrix.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Santos Silva has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Paulo M.D.C. Parente & Joao M.C. Santos Silva, 2011. "A Cautionary Note on Tests for Overidentifying Restrictions," Discussion Papers 1111, Exeter University, Department of Economics.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 11:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Generalized method of moments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]