Talk:Gentleman (2016 film)

Gentleman (2016 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 29, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 20 January 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

A fact from Gentleman (2016 film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 July 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Indian filmmaker Mohan Krishna Indraganti dedicated the second half of his Telugu-language film Gentleman to Alfred Hitchcock as a tribute?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gentleman (2016 film).

Wikipedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gentleman (2016 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this within a couple of days! JAGUAR 17:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay. Reviewing now... JAGUAR 11:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments[edit]

"directed by Mohan Krishna Indraganti, who co-wrote the film with R. David Nathan" - might sound better if it was compacted: directed by Mohan Krishna Indraganti and co-written by R. David Nathan.

Done

"The story, written by Nathan" - no need, as Nathan is already mentioned in the lead's first sentence

Done

Three paragraphs in the Plot section begin with "Catherine". If you think it's best, I would at least recommend merging the third and fourth paragraphs together so that it improves the flow

Done As for Catherine's repetition, well, queens makes more noise compared to rooks.

"David stabs Jai fatally at a warehouse" - David fatally stabs Jai in a warehouse

Done

"According to Indraganti, the costumes, production design, and cinematography co-ordinated well" - try According to Indraganti, the costumes, production design, and cinematography were well-coordinated, resulting in the film being produced with an "interesting palette"

Done

"claiming it the biggest release for a Nani film up to that date." - it sounds like Nani directed the film or produced it. Try biggest release for a film starring Nani

Done

"Besides the United States, Gentleman was released in other overseas markets such as Africa, Germany, and Mauritius" - this could do with rephrasing as Mauritius is part of Africa technically

Done Removed Mauritius

No dead links

A special thanks to Wayback Machine and other Internet archiving websites.

Those were all of the minor prose nitpicks I could find, but other than that it's an excellent article once again! It is comprehensive, well sourced, and well written throughout. Will pass once all of the above are out of the way. JAGUAR 11:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: All done. Awaiting your judgement. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for addressing them. This looks good to go now. Well done!

JAGUAR 11:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]