Talk:Gentrification in Philadelphia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Gentrification in Philadelphia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PwnerELITE (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Quality[edit]

This article is quite poor. It cites no sources and the language used is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.Jordalus (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Community Displacement in Philadelphia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Community Displacement in Philadelphia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Community Displacement in Philadelphia[edit]

The article Community Displacement in Philadelphia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essentially all unsourced original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plot Spoiler (talk) 13:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Community Displacement in Philadelphia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Community Displacement in Philadelphia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Displacement in Philadelphia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  ‑ Iridescent 13:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Syrenka V -- I said a prayer to the patron saint of lost causes and jumped into this article. You are invited. I'm taking stock of the sad sack of External references first. Here is my thesis, for which I already have a couple of good sources: A city in decline sinks as a whole, a city with some economic growth experiences gentrification which is by its nature uneven. When certain neighborhoods improve, the lower income residents are displaced yada yada. I would like to make sure to manage the fork with List of Philadelphia neighborhoods. Residential areas aren't the only areas upheaved. Retail changed too. Rhadow (talk) 23:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhadow! This doesn't look like a lost cause to me at all, just a hot mess. This is an example of the practical importance of providing full academic-style references and inline citations for every Wikipedia article, even those on non-academic-looking topics—including archival via WebCite or the Wayback Machine whenever possible, for everything except published books and academic journal articles. It looks as though a number of the dead external links are still there at other URLs, and can be revived and used as references. For example, the link Penn Offers Cash Incentive to Increase Home ownership in University City is dead, but a Google search on its title turns up this live link to the article as the very first hit. If it had been referenced with archival, it would never have been gone from the Wikipedia page. I suspect that if even a few full academic-style references to very substantial sources like this had been provided as this article was constructed, no deletionist would ever have dared to place an AfD tag on it.
—Syrenka V (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rhadow, I would also suggest adding this to the ARS rescue list. —Syrenka V (talk) 01:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Syrenka V -- You think that's something I should learn to do myself ... or Sawyer-style it? Here is what I discovered so far: the various Philadelphia neighborhood articles are not well referenced either. This little project will touch a bunch of articles. We have some FORK work to do. Rhadow (talk) 01:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's just that all of the additions to the rescue list for the last several weeks have been by me, except for three by Cunard. I don't want to give anyone the impression that I'm trying to WP:OWN the rescue list :-) I'm also still involved in trying to counteract the deletionist crusade against Bitcoin-related articles like Bitnation and Bitcoin Magazine. And now Cunard has informed us that there are two more such, ItBit and LocalBitcoins—all nominated for deletion by the same user!
—Syrenka V (talk) 01:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting back to the present article: from the REF fields in the "External links" section, it would appear that someone was trying to achieve the effect of decluttering the main text by keeping all the references in one place and citing them with short tags. That's a desirable goal, but a much better way of achieving it is the use of something I discovered recently: list-defined references and the {{r}} template. I've started a list-defined reference set inside the "References" section. One nice feature is that you can mix list-defined references with other types; you don't have to make the change all at once. References can be moved one by one from the main text and the "External links" section into the "References" section.
—Syrenka V (talk) 02:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Instead of dynamiting the existing piece, I am trying to retain the organization of the article by neighborhood. This requires attention to POV. The existing text carries with it an attitude of development is bad. This needs to be balanced with a recognition of the inevitability of change and the positive effects of neighborhood improvement. Rhadow (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just the facts, ma'am[edit]

The geographic details belong in the main articles about the neighborhoods. Only when they are related to gentrification do they go in this article. Analysts use distance from City Hall as an independent variable in gentrification calculations in Philly, so it is included.

Gentrification has first to do with real estate, then with class, race and ethnicity. The article is not a sociological study of the neighborhoods. Rhadow (talk) 14:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gentrification in Philadelphia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to US Housing Edit-a-thon[edit]

Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 10:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: African American Studies[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katewr (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Katewr (talk) 15:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gentrification_in_Philadelphia&oldid=1217052464"