Talk:George Campbell Jr.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Objection : Assertions and Conclusions[edit]

There a very clear POV issue here. Multiple assertions and conclusions about "quality" and decision-making process are directly evident. And the attempt at coloring cited articles as "fact" and "opinion" is a blatant attempt at affecting the reader's conclusions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2002:405A:A6B4:0:0:0:0:0 (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Increase Endowment / Usability of New Academic Building?[edit]

Citation needed: "Its new building that opened in 2009 is now one of the nation’s premiere science and engineering facilities" is false. Students, alumni and faculty feel that 41 Cooper Square serves engineering needs worse than the previous building.

Citation needed: "By some accounting techniques, the accompanying real estate transactions can be understood to have led to a net positive cash flow"

Ferociouslettuce (talk) 16:23, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huron Consulting Group financial presentation -[edit]

Claims that Cooper Union operated a deficit before the early 90s is contradicted here. Please use WP:V when making future edits 2607:FB90:544A:8168:6536:6694:31A7:F7B (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like "Blatant Advertising"[edit]

The "Career" section appears to meet the requirements to be considered "blatant advertising" per Wikipedia:Identifying_blatant_advertising: "It describes this person's educational career in-depth - typically by listing each school or university the person attended and the qualifications, certificates, deeds, awards, etc earned." and "It describes this person's professional career or relevant experience in-depth - typically by listing each of the person's held roles, positions, job titles, elected seats, etc along with their responsibilities, accomplishments, and skills needed, and the date in which the person held the job."

It may be preferable to pare down this section to the essential points only.

I see that the page has been edited significantly in recent days but without addressing the issues raised here or above, as well as the tags on the page itself. This has gone too long without a fix. I'm going to make some edits today to try to address these concerns. KeeYou Flib (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing Concerns[edit]

I have made a number of edits to the article to try to address the legitimate concerns raised on this talk page as to POV / neutrality issues and a lack of citations. If there are issues, let's discuss them here. KeeYou Flib (talk) 19:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]