Talk:George Eustice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Communist Obsession?[edit]

Appeared on BBC 1 News on 25/02/12, suggesting the only opposition to the Workfare scheme had come from a small minority of 'Communists'. Does anyone have a link to the information on which his contention was based? Much of the opposition is coming from members of the Conservative Party - are there still 'enemies within'?

Yes, at BBC1 News .. . "It's the Socialist Workers Party" he says. He seems to imply that firms leaving the scheme are responding to blackmail.Lots of repitition the favour that unemployed people are being given by HMG.Is this significant enough to go in the article? Vernon White . . . Talk 00:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Errors[edit]

It is wrong to say that he succeeded Julia Goldsworthy. Camborne and Redruth is a new Constituency. Why has this article got a liberal democrat tag? Vernon White . . . Talk 16:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on George Eustice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]