Talk:George Leonardos
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Conflict of Interest
[edit]- The article has been reverted back to its pre-COI state but retained the tag. Should in theory comply with Wikipedia rules again now. People are simply not allowed to write their own articles. This is a straightforward fact in the rules and is not up for interpretation. 45Factoid44 (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- You can reinsert the COI tag if you'd like, but I'd kindly request that you do not blindly revert other user's edits for no good reason. I made grammatical corrections, format corrections, re-added in cross links to other languages, and re-inserted the sources used from some of a another user's edits. These improved the article and had no reason to be blindly reverted. I have a right to edit any page I wish, and given that I didn't try to change much of the content because I'm not educated in this field, I was quite right in my grammatical/format corrections. NcSchu(Talk) 06:36, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to revert your edits NcSchu. Sorry. 45Factoid44 (talk) 22:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- Then why did you do it again? You do realize that in these reversions you are removing references, removing page formatting, and changing nothing in the content. If you have a problem with the content, then correct it, but don't remove page formatting and references as such a thing is a violation of WP:MOS and I won't hesitate to warn you as you've proven time and time again to be too trigger happy when it comes to reverting edits. NcSchu(Talk) 23:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I wash my hands of this. Don't care what you do. More important things for me to be involved in. 45Factoid44 (talk) 04:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- Then why did you do it again? You do realize that in these reversions you are removing references, removing page formatting, and changing nothing in the content. If you have a problem with the content, then correct it, but don't remove page formatting and references as such a thing is a violation of WP:MOS and I won't hesitate to warn you as you've proven time and time again to be too trigger happy when it comes to reverting edits. NcSchu(Talk) 23:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to revert your edits NcSchu. Sorry. 45Factoid44 (talk) 22:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Leonardos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006141558/http://www.idrbotsi.gr/frontoffice/portal.asp?cpage=RESOURCE&cresrc=10&cnode=4 to http://www.idrbotsi.gr/frontoffice/portal.asp?cpage=RESOURCE&cresrc=10&cnode=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)