Jump to content

Talk:George Lincoln Rockwell/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Mirror sites

This article is now being used, with attribution, by: http://www.fact-index.com/g/ge/george_lincoln_rockwell.html — Clarknova 01:49, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, they're one of our mirror sites, one rated highly compliant with the GFDL - David Gerard 11:40, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Portrait of Rockwell

Here is one portrait of Rockwell that could be used for the article.[1]

Other images [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.174.52.48 (talk) 03:12, 13 February 2006‎

Congressman Stanley Tupper

I removed the Congressman Stanley Tupper reference. I did a search on Google and found nothing that connected the two men. If Tupper only knew Rockwell in his youth then the reference is not significant. I found Congressman Tupper supported civil rights legislation in the 60's. This would hardly make Tupper a supporter of Rockwell or his cause. If there is other information of importance regarding Tupper and Rockwell then a paragraph should be developed and included in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.174.52.87 (talk) 02:15, 12 March 2006‎

According to William Schmaltz's Hate: George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party, Tupper was one of the people he interviewed for the book. During the interview, Tupper talked about how he spent much time with Rockwell in Boothbay and at Hebron Academy. Years later as a US Congressmen, Tupper still maintained a closed door friendship, even though he disapproved of what he was doing. In fact, during their last conversation, Rockwell confided in Tupper that his life was nearing its end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.49.80.58 (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2006‎

Atlanta connection ?

I removed the section on the Atlanta demonstration and the synagogue bombing. In Rockwell's autobiography he thought the Feds would try to connect him to the event. A separate article titled 1958 Atlanta temple bombing should be created and perhaps a reference to Rockwell be added. 216.174.52.242 10:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Elijah Muhammad & Malcom X

At the same time, Rockwell reached out to form friendly associations with the Nation of Islam, for its shared belief in racial separation. He also had great respect for Elijah Muhammad as the "Black people's Hitler," for doing the best job promoting integrity and pride among his people. Finally, he admired Malcolm X, as his black equivalent and the next true leader for Black America, even after his split from the Black Muslim organization.

Can we find the sources for this, if there are sources? --Liberlogos 04:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Maybe this will help.[3]67.72.98.45 01:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Predominately VS Predominantly

Recent changes made to this article have changed the spelling of predominately to an alternative predominantly. My first instinct as I prefer the former was to change it back, but I decided to investige. Both mean the same, and here is what I came up with:

There’s been a lot of scholarly argument about the relative merits of these two words down the years, most of it directed at the linked adjectives, predominate and predominant. Some usage writers have condemned the former as illiterate, arguing that it can only be a verb, never an adjective. History is against all such critics, because predominate as an adjective first appeared as far back as 1591, and is actually older than the verb. The spelling of the adverb as predominately is about a hundred years older than the predominantly form. Predominantly and its related adjective are now much the more common forms, though that doesn’t make the other pair wrong, just less often currently preferred alternatives.

Now this is not biggie and I am not gonna upset editors over this...I prefer predominately. Personally. Anyone else with thoughts on this, and isn't wiki policy to leave unchanged that which is acceptable even if it is not someones preferred spelling? For now, as it affects none of the content I see no reason to change it. Any thoughts though??? Joey James 00:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

"Frankly, Scarlett..." I didn't know there were 2, & "predominately" was older. Thanks. Trekphiler 12:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC) (BTW, please yourself, 'cause somebody's bound to change it, anyhow. 12:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC))

Unreliable sources

Large portions of this article are sourced not from the references listed in the References section, but from sources that seem to me to be unreliable. In some cases these are for claims that shouldn't be controversial, but other cases look a little problematic. Consider this paragraph for instance:

Rockwell's next tactic was to hold a rally in Union Square in New York City. He went there to demand a permit to speak and soon found himself surrounded by his archenemies: the Jews. A near riot erupted as Rockwell began to answer reporters' questions. Rockwell said that 80 percent of the Jewish population in America were Communist sympathizers and therefore traitors who should be gassed, on the basis that most of the convicted spies happened to be Jewish. The crowd went wild, demanding Rockwell be killed on the spot. He was given a protected escort out of New York City and never received the permit to hold the rally. 15

The linked source is, in fact, a chapter of Rockwell's book This Time The World, as published on a UK racist Web site. Since this is a work of political opinion, it is a reliable source for what Rockwell or other neo-Nazis think but it is not reliable for what happened in New York.

Chiefly, the claim that he "found himself surrounded by his archenemies: the Jews" and the claim that "the crowd went wild, demanding Rockwell be killed on the spot" seem to be the sort of unreliable claims that come from using unreliable sources. --FOo 10:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I followed a link to this article from another as I didn't recognize the name and I must say this is one of the most untrustworthy Wikipedia articles I have ever seen. A lot of information is given, and almost all of it is completely unsourced. The unsourced material should be removed until it can be backed up by a reliable source. Magnus 13:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

"Bad sources"? That's for sure. It says

"Rockwell flew old Curtiss biplanes which were launched by aircraft catapults from Omaha. Off the coast of Africa, Rockwell helped in the sinking of two Axis subs when he was part of a carrier hunter-killer group."

To begin with, Curtiss biplanes had long since been obsolete & out of service by 1941. Nor do I recall CVE Omaha being a part of any ops off Africa (my guess is Bogue, the targets a couple of Type 14s, IIRC); in fact, I don't recall the existence of a CVE Omaha. And "co-ordinated air support on Guam"? I've never seen his name connected to it before. That's only what I know just offhand... Trekphiler 12:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC) I gotta learn to read the d*mn articles... 12:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Citing Television?

I am watching the History Channel right now, & the program states emphatically that he was murdered due to disagreements over the superiority of lighter-skinned whites. How does one cite a television program as a source? Or do we just say "We have no way of verifying the show's sources, so we don't cite them at all"? 96.241.3.248 (talk) 05:33, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Pardon me, I forgot to log in. FlaviaR (talk) 05:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

POV check

This article was listed in Category:NPOV disputes from June 2007. Since there has been no recent discussion regarding this article's neutrality and no outstanding correctable issues left on the talk page, I have removed the pov-check tag. If anyone disagrees, please revert my removal and list your grievances here. --Gimme danger (talk) 01:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Many words, few sources

This article seems very long compared to the number of sources. For example, the assassination section is very detailed, yet it doesn't have a single source despite being marked since 2006! I'll give this article a few weeks to see if anyone wants to improve it. After that I'll cut it down to what's supported by the obvious or inline sources.   Will Beback  talk  20:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Second Wife

The article states that Rockwell's second wife was named Thora Hallgrímsson. Shouldn't her last name be Hallgrímssdóttir, following Icelandic naming conventions?


She is named as Þóra Hallgrímsdóttir in Icelandic media: http://www.dv.is/frettir/2011/5/12/bjorgolfur-bodinn-opnunarhatid-horpu-um-helgina/ and under Icelandic law her patronym is Hallgrímsdóttir. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.162.5 (talk) 04:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Can we dispense with writing Mrs. Rockwell's first name as Þóra? Rockwell in This Time the World does not write it that way but transliterates it as Thora, which uses only characters from the English alphabet, and which everybody will know how to pronounce. I think Anglophones who know how to pronounce Þóra are probably few and far between. Your Buddy Fred Lewis (talk) 09:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

"The House on Hatemonger Hill"

Is there a single substantiated reference to this? Did anyone---let alone conservative Virginians in the 1960s--- actually use the term "Hatemonger" at that time? It sounds like nothing more than self-righteous leftist propaganda from the 1980s or later. Deleted until someone can scrape up some evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.102.101.85 (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

I found two references in the week following his assassination in newspapers: In the Beaver County Times from 1967-08-30[1] titled "Nazis Ponder Burial of Their Slain Leader" starts with "The hierarchy of the American Nazis gather today at 'Hatemonger Hill'..."; and in the Spokesman-Review from 1967-09-03[2], finishes with the line "But once it fades, the Nazis very likely will grow lonely and hungry and slip away one by one from the house on 'Hatemonger Hill.'" Both references individually, and especially put together, seem to indicate this was in parlance at the time. This is the edit the above appears to have done. --UnwashedMeme (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "Nazis Ponder Burial Of Their Slain Leader". Beaver County Times. No. Vol. 92 No. 127. UPI. 1967-08-30. Retrieved 29 May 2015. {{cite news}}: |issue= has extra text (help)
  2. ^ Burchard, Hank (1967-09-03). "Rockewell's Party Expected to Fade". The Spokesman-Review. No. 85th Year. No 112. Retrieved 29 May 2015.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on George Lincoln Rockwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Mental Stability

I find it intresting that non of the articles dealing with racist/white hate leaders explain the cause of these individual's deillusions of "Communist jews" or "massive mixing conspiricy", neurologically. I mean, these people HAD to have something very wrong with them to make them believe this crazy sh*t. It just dos'nt make sense and its pissing me off, why the hell wont they just leave us alone? 69.250.130.215 06:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Not all assholes are crazy. There's no evidence that Rockwell had any excuse of this kind for his idiocy, paranoia, and depravity. 2601:647:4F00:4011:6902:597F:E7BB:FA5A (talk) 07:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

This is not a forum, go find one and then post what you want... but not here. Shadowy Crafter 04:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Attempting to explain fucked up beliefs with psychology is quackery. I'm not one to decry today's mainstream psychology's supposed over-diagnosing of people, but Rockwell was a product of history, not chemical imbalances. It is, in fact, dangerous not to recognize this. I could go on, but as Shadowy Crafter said just above me, this is not a forum. MQDuck 11:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Bias

In attempting to write from a neutral point of view (I hope this is the reason, anyway), this article becomes uncritical, in particular when stating his specific beliefs and reasonings. For instance (bold added by me):

"With the appearance of the skinhead movement of the 1970s and 1980s many working class youths became a part of a neo-Nazi revival. The movement appeared for the most part on its own; the root cause was alienation of white youths in an ever increasingly multi-racial society."

I, for one, would strongly disagree with that statement, or at least declare it a dangerously incomplete explanation. It should not be stated factually. I also deleted a statement implying that the peace protesters Rockwell was, so to speak, "fighting" against were hypocrites.

The article gives a lot of detailed, factual information and, assuming it's all correct and not chosen in a biased way, is very useful. I suggest a thorough check of all the facts, some minor rewriting of many of the sentences, and eventually adding some of the basic counter-arguments to his that are given in the article.

UPDATE: Forgot to sign in before. MQDuck 11:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

This article is very biased. It doesn't mention positive references to this true American. His right to political views is the same as any other American and should not be bashed for what he believed in. -'unsigned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.89.190 (talk • contribs)
  • I reverted your edit to this article because it was factually incorrect. George Lincoln Rockwell was a neo-Nazi, and has only been influential to a minority of people with similar views, not to all nationalists or Americans. That is not being biased; it is stating fact.Spylab 14:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
But did he not have a wider, indirect influence? Personally, I don't know, but it should be asked. MQDuck 11:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Can references be cited proving he did have a wider influence? That would seem to be the wikipedia test. Personally I'd not come across the name until some reading on black civil rights movements in the USA turned up that some white extremists had turned up at a Nation of Islam event. --mgaved 16:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Rockwell was a hero. This article does not mention all the great things he did in his life. A bad article indeed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.74.105 (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you know what "hero" means. Rockwell was a fifth-rate Goebbels wannabe. 73.252.205.43 (talk) 09:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Why the photo of "James Byrd, Jr., a victim of his followers"? Is this not irrelevant and POV?

Right now, this is a bad article

First of all, this article is awfully long for a basically minor fringe figure. Second of all, parts of it read like a hagiography. There's a whole long paragraph about how as boy he learned courage by standing off a gang of toughs (sole source:Rockwell)... he didn't get into Harvard only because of some screwup with his school records, so he went back for another year of high school, hmmmm... blah blah blah... paragraphs and paragraphs about his deep understanding of philiosophy etc etc. Really bad article. Herostratus 08:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree, it does read like a Hagiography, it is obvious that some of the contributors to this article are probably sympathetic to his movemement. Even the Skrewdriver website is listed as a source, so clearly pulling from bias sources. It does need much cleaning up and revising, I am particularly too lazy to do it myself, so someone else should have a go at it.
But the length of the article I have no problem with, the more information on any subject can never be bad. xcuref1endx 13:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Why don't you compare it to the Rosa Parks or Malcolm X article?216.174.53.248 02:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Rockwell actually isn't a minor fringe figure. His movement was rather large during the civil rights era. He just isn't talked about any longer.

Calling Rockwell a minor fringe figure is a bit of a misnomer. The American Nazi Party was, with regards to political groups, are fairly major event. As it was formed less than twenty years after WW2, one can't help but think of it has being of some historical note. However, Rockwell's group never was too large. It maintained a fairly limited membership, even during the civil rights era.

Also, I'd like one to explain why we would ever compare Rockwell's article to Rosa Parks' ?

Rosa Parks = Sweet Old Black Lady, Rockwell = Paranoid Pipe Smoking Bastard, oh sure, there are SO many comparisons... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.250.130.215 (talk) 06:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC).
I assume that the suggstion of comparison mentioned was not to establish your view of their negative and positive qualities, but to say that other articles have refences from sympathetic sources and this should not be a problem if the source is reliable, just because a source does not promote a specific or accepted political outlook does not make it unreliable in itself. It is not an agument to say one article is better or should get better treatment because the subject is ' nicer'. But as it stands, most of the above comments were unsigned and useless. It is unlikey they will return or contribute in a constructive way. PyrE 00:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

No need to discuss perceived similarities between rockwell/parks, ect. however, the assassination section sounds like it was written by indiana jones, with practically no citations or sources. an important figure deserves credit, regardless of his beliefs or actions. that section is just ridiculous. where can it go from here without creating edit war III? Aceholiday (talk) 23:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

To compare George Lincoln Rockwell with Rosa Parks is ridiculous. To compare Rockwell with Malcolm X, however, isn't all that farfetched, as both were racial separatists during the sixties. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Floyd Williams (talk • contribs) 03:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

What did Rosa Parks do that was significant? 108.38.35.162 (talk) 21:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on George Lincoln Rockwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Evidence he wrote 'Fable of the Ducks and the Hens'

What evidence is there? And I don't mean links to neo-Nazi sites saying he he the author, I mean real evidence. It is not in his autobiography, no in the pro-Rockell documentary, not in hostile biographies about him. And in addition, the authorised comic book you can buy of it doesn't actually mention his name anywhere in it. So what Wiki approved evidence is there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.230.125 (talk) 15:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

I haven't heard of that fable but in White Power (not his autobiography which I believe is This Time the World) he relates how he wrote a paper in college about a group of scientists who travel to Africa to study ants and concluded that natural rather than environmental factors caused the ants to be ants. The paper was supposed to explore the causes of crime and delinquency and the university didn't like his "impudence" so they let him re-write it for credit so long as he made didn't make any more indirect cracks about how blacks weren't products of their environment.
I'm just beginning to study Rockwell so if I run across a source for the Ducks and Hens fable, I will add it here. 47.137.183.192 (talk) 03:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Rockwell and Vietnam

Rockwell was not an opponent of the Vietnam War. I made the correct changes.216.174.52.13 14:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Maybe he wasn't an opponent but I believe (using White Power as my source) that he was highly critical of U.S. motives for being involved in Vietnam. My interpretation of what he says about Vietnam in the book is that it was a smokescreen to make it seem that the U.S. was "containing" communism by supporting South Vietnam while communism was quietly being implemented at home by U.S. Jews. 47.137.183.192 (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

RV unsourced POV "National Review"

i removed a section asserting that roockwell was a conservative who once worked wor the National Review magazine for lack of sourcing.

as it turns out, there's actually positive evidence against the verity of this claim. William F. Buckley and the magazine won a libel suit against another magazine which made this claim.

http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/07/16/specials/buckley-libel.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.178.66.32 (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2008‎

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on George Lincoln Rockwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Thora's "uncle, bishop of Iceland"

In 'This Time the World' Rockwell sais:

"Nothing could quench the blazing fire between us, and after a passionate and wonderful courtship of only five months, we were married in Icelandic in the National Cathedral in Reykjavik, where her uncle is the Bishop of Iceland, on October 3, 1953."

In the Icelandic newspaper Morgunblaðið, Oct. 3rd 1953 there is an announcement of the marriage. It sais:

"Today will be married by rev. Jón Auðuns, Þóra Hallgrímsdóttir ... and G Lincoln Rockwell, commander in the US Navy."

Reverend Jón Auðuns was never bishop and he was not Þóra's uncle. According to Íslendingabók which some believe is the most complete geological database in the world they were not related at all. Moi (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC) geological: genealogical Moi (talk) 04:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Early Life

You cannot "enroll as a philosophy major" at Brown. To enroll in a Brown "concentration" has prerequisites, and it is unlikely Rockwell ever did declare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qphilo (talk • contribs) 20:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Negro or African American

...and supported the resettlement of all American Negroes in a new African state to be funded by the U.S. government.

Should this be African American? I am not sure given the context and time period. Elcaleeds (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Rockwell's ashes

The Savitri Devi article references Goodrick-Clarke and claims that Rockwell's ashes are kept in a red house in Arlington, Virginia. Should it be added?--Adûnâi (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

The Goodrick-Clarke source doesn't say anything about a red house. It says they were "purportedly" placed next to Rockwell's in their "Nazi hall of honor" in Virginia. The source is not clear exactly where this hall was. I found an unreliable source saying the shrine was in New Berlin, Wisconsin. Plausible, but it needs a source. Still, there is very little reason to think the ashes are still in Virginia, since the party isn't there anymore. Perhaps the party left them behind, and the new owners of the building used them as cat litter. Regardless, we would need sources to say where these ashes are now. Grayfell (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for clarification, it's a murky issue. I, however, find fascinating your tone, "Perhaps... the new owners of the building used them as cat litter", considering that both of these aforementioned Nazis were animal-lovers (Savitri Devi owned no fewer than 20 cats).--Adûnâi (talk) 12:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
I don't think it's murky, I think it's pointless trivia. This all seems like it was a bunch of nao-Nazis moping around in shabby buildings in the middle of nowhere, trying, and failing, to make themselves seem important. Rockwell's notability stems from his attention-seeking stunts, and this is just more of the same. If any of these stunts, or the stunts of his followers, is notable, you would need reliable sources explaining why it is notable, not merely that it happened. His supposed love of animals is just more trivia. Grayfell (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Assassination or murder?

The lead says that Rockwell was murdered, but he was a public figure and the likely motive was political in nature. Public figures who are murdered for political reasons are commonly called victims of assassination (see MLK and Malcolm X). Is Rockwell's ideology being used against him as a reason to not accurately categorize his death? 47.137.183.192 (talk) 04:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Nowhere does the article explain how this was politically motivated, nor does it give any motive at all. The John Patler article doesn't either. This information would require reliable sources. Assassination is a subset of murder, so just saying "murder" is sufficient and more neutral until such sources are provided. Grayfell (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. I've eliminated references to assassination from the article for these reasons. João Do Rio (talk) 21:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

On the entry for "American Nazi Party" Rockwell's killing is called an assassination and the murder an assassin throughout the entry. There isn't a reference given, but the media reported Rockwell's killing as an assassination. I'm not sure which is the right term to use, but there should probably be consistency between this entry and the one on the American Nazi Party? TheBlueTortoise (talk) 07:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Belatedly, I have changed that article, as explained at Talk:American Nazi Party. I agree that this term is not strictly incorrect, but still do not think it adds clarity. The information is better presented in direct, simple language. Grayfell (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Publications

I ran a Google search for "How Malcolm X Helped Aryans". Doesn't exist. The only results were three identical Wiki entries with basically the same contents of this article. There isn't even a source for this. Which one of you put that there?2600:1700:E710:5D20:30E0:A3AE:F616:6819 (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

It was added by an anonymous vandal. I've removed it. Grayfell (talk) 23:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_Lincoln_Rockwell/Archive_1&oldid=1248606086"