Talk:George Rich

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal George Rich is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

I am baffled by the reference to Rich J writing in Isaacs v McKinnon simply "appeal dismissed". If you access this link you will clearly see that Rich J wrote much more than just appeal dismissed. I am wondering where the trivia quiz that is cited got this info? If someone can't back up this information then I propose to remove the entire reference to the Isaacs v McKinnon case. --Shadow007 05:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the reference to Rich writing "appeal dismissed". I'm not sure where the quiz was sourced from, although it was published on a UNSW Law Faculty page. Given that they misspelt the other judge's name (they called Clyne Klyne) the rest of it may not be accurate. I've left in the preceding sentence though, that's sourced from Dixon's papers, and clearly attributed to Dixon. --bainer (talk) 08:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite happy with that. Cheers.--Shadow007 13:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Sydney Uni Boat Club claims it was founded in 1860, Rich was born in 1863. This article takes from the Aust Dictionary of Biography and says he founded the Boat Club. Well did he ? -Sticks66 13:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Rich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061111052050/http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au:80/lawlink/supreme_court/ll_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_speech_spigelman_220503 to http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/supreme_court/ll_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_speech_spigelman_220503

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]