Talk:Georgina Kenaghan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 10:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

• I will review this article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Is this going to be started? Wizardman 15:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

---

After reviewing this, the article looks good to me, and clearly meets the GA criteria. Hence, I am going to pass this one. Article is fully supported by sources, neutral, no POV issues, and contains enough detail to summarise the article. The image is CC-BY-SA-3.0, and has a OTRS template.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Passed. Good job. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)