This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
A fact from German atrocities committed against Polish prisoners of war appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 June 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I am a bit surprised that the article doesn't mention that the treatment of Polish prisoners (with some exceptions) generally was in line with the Geneva Convention and their death rate was similar to that prisoners of war from Western Allied countries.[1] The Italian military internees encountered more atrocities and had a higher death rate but their article doesn't get an "atrocities" in the title.
Judging from the article title one might get the impression that the treatment of Polish POWs was comparable to that of Soviet POWs, which is not accurate. It seems like bias could be avoided by renaming and rewriting to cover the entire experience of Polish POWs in German captivity.
References
^Gerlach, Christian (2016). The Extermination of the European Jews. Cambridge University Press. p. 235. ISBN978-0-521-70689-6. the German military again treated prisoners, except those from the USSR, largely according to the international laws of war... Mortality rates were low: 2–4% for Poles, 1–2.8% for French, about 1% for British and US prisoners, 2–2.5% for Belgians , 2–3% for Dutch and 3–6% for Yugoslavs. [his source for these figures seems to be Overmans , Rüdiger , 2005 . " Die Kriegsgefangenenpolitik des Deutschen Reiches
1939 bis 1945 ," DRZW , 9/2 ( Munich : dva ), pp. 729 – 875 .]{{cite book}}: line feed character in |quote= at position 410 (help)
IMHO, the title of the article speaks for itself, focusing on the atrocities rather than describing the overall situation of Polish POWs in German captivity. Whether this article should be expanded and renamend or a separate article about the overall situation of Polish POWs should be created is, of course, open to discussion. WP:BOLD is should be applied here.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 08:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think a bigger issue than the article scope is the lack of clarity that what is described in the article wasn't the usual treatment of Polish POWs. A reader who is not familiar with the topic could get the impression that executions of Polish POWs was common when the sources don't agree. (t · c) buidhe14:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The definitio of "usual" and "common" is key here. Polish POWs were treated better than Soviets and exececuted "less", but were worse of than those from Anglo-American states. See for example this. For the POWs from the occupied states captivity was made more onerous by the fact that, while their captors were still in theory regarding them as subject to the terms of the convention just like British and American POWs, the absence of the threat of retaliation meant that in practice their treatment deteriorated. The living conditions of the remaining Polish prisoners, for example, were noted by the Swiss to be often considerably below those granted captured British servicemen... The differences in the treatment accorded Anglo-American and other POWs became even more stark in March 1944, when OKW issued instructions that all escaped prisoners would in future be secretly handed over to the SS Security Service (SD) and sent to the concentration camp at Mauthausen to be executed: "except," the order cautioned, "British and American prisoners of war" . In [12] the author writes (p.160): Although never reaching the same defree of targeted mass killing of Polish prisoners at Katyn, Nazi occupiers followed a similar territorial pattern of committing very high levels of abuse against Polish prisoners... Since Poland was one of the eventual central sites for the Final Solution, German conduct toward prisoners remained extremely harsh... @Dreamcatcher25 may have better sources on this (Datner?). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here16:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article could and probably should be expanded to cover living conditions as well, and comparison between different nationalities of prisoners of war. However, particularly as the "racial" distinction is mentioned in the article it seems reasonable to mention the counterpoint from Gerlach that, despite being 'racially' not very different from Soviets, the conditions they were held in and death rate they suffered "differed in the extreme".[1] (t · c) buidhe17:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Personaly, it's hard for me to understand how this article could create an impression that the atrocities against Polish POWs were similar to the Nazi genocidal policy towards Soviet POWs. In the case of the latter, around 3.3 million were murdered or starved to death, while this article describes the war crimes that cost the lives of a few thousand Polish POWs. I know that this probably should be a subject of separate discussion but maybe relevant article should be named "extermination of Soviet POWs", rather than "atrocities committed against"?
Nevertheless, Piotrus asked about Szymon Datner. In his book Zbrodnie Wehrmachtu na jeńcach wojennych w II wojnie światowej ("Wehrmacht war crimes against POWs during Second World War") from 1961, he wrote (my rough translation):
"Sporadic atrocities against prisoners of war took place already during the September campaign of 1939. Although they are far smaller in scale compared to the atrocities of 1941-1945, their character and cruelty resemble many later major crimes" (p. 7). At the same page, Datner quoted a German order which stated: "Although they [Polish POWs - D25] are subject to the 1929 Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War until their release, those provisions which presuppose the existence of the Polish State as a warring power, such as the provisions on the rights and obligations of a "Protecting power", do not apply." Later on (page 8), he provides a few examples of how international law was violated by the Germans concerning the treatment of Polish POWs: 1) Those who were accused of various offenses were not court-martialed but handed over to Sondergerichts or Sicherheitspolizei, 2) Many were coerced into labor through "physical or mental terror". 3) In September 1943, Polish POWs became the first victims of the new policy towards escaped POWs, exemplified by the Dössel atrocity. 4) In 1944, serious attempts were made to force Polish officers who were POWs to work, and they faced the looming threat of physical annihilation as the German authorities attempted to collectively place them in concentration camps, 5) They were also utilized as human shields in areas that were heavily bombarded by the Allies.
On the other hand, Geoffrey P. Megargee in his book War of Annihilation: Combat and Genocide on the Eastern Front, 1941 (Polish edition, p. 73) stated (again my rough translation): “Both in operational planning and during the German-Soviet war, Soviet POWs were assigned the lowest level in the hierarchy, while American and British prisoners were placed at the top. They [Americans and Brits – D25] were followed in the hierarchy by prisoners of other Western nationalities such as French, Norwegians, Belgians, and Dutch. Prisoners from the Balkans were placed below them, and finally, Poles.
@Dreamcatcher25 Thank you for looking at the sources. Perhaps we could add a sentence to the lead, and/or a small section to the body, called "comparison with other groups" or such, in which we could mention Gerlach statistics, as well as other stuff related to the hierarchy of prisoners and their treatment by the Germans. Such a section should be present in other corresponding articles about those groups too, and maybe it would serve as a basis of the proper article about treatment of POWs by Nazi Germany. Btw, I started a discussion about the name of the Soviet POWs article at its talk page. It was actually titled "extermination" early and maybe restoring that old n ame would help to underline the difference in horrific treatment of Soviet POWs compared to other groups? Polish POWs were subject to some "sporadic atrocities" (as Datner says, and that phrase might be good adding to the article here, if you could work it out, with a source - book title, page number, etc.), but Soviet ones were subject to what it seems to me indeed can be desrbibed as "extermination". Renaming the Soviet POWs article might also reduce the confusion anyone can feel from both articles being currently named in the same way. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here02:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus I am sorry to say that but after this edit this article indeed may be partially misleading. Now the reader without the deepen knowledge about Warsaw Uprising may think that Polish POWs vere executed without exeption, while according to the capitulation Act from October 3, 1944, Home Army soldiers who surrendered in the last days of uprising were supposed to be treated as regular prisoners of war. This should be taken into consideration to ensure a more accurate understanding of the situation. Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dreamcatcher25 I have no objections to restoring and expanding this, but as it was written, this paragraph seemed not relevant to the topic here as it does not discuss any POWs executions or other abuse. If it were to be restored in the current form, I'd tag it with [relevant?] or [clarification needed]. Perhaps if you restored it and added a clarificaiton based on what you wrote just above it would result in more clear content? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here08:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]