Talk:German destroyer Z16 Friedrich Eckoldt/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 11:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Progression
[edit]- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
[edit]- a (Disambiguations):
b (Linkrot)
c (Alt text)
d (Copyright)
Criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- in the lead, "heavy cruiser" is probably overlinked;
- in the body, "Skagerrak" is probably overlinked;
- slight redundancy, I think: "The following month, she escorted the pocket battleship Lützow from Kiel to Norway in mid-June" (specifically "The following month" and "in mid-June");
- Your changes look good. Thanks. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- No issues.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- in the body "4,400 nautical miles (8,100 km; 5,100 mi) at 19 knots", but in the infobox: "1,825 nmi (3,380 km; 2,100 mi) at 19 knots";
- Look again, intended range was 4400 nmi, but actual was 1825.
- I see. Sorry, I'm still confused, though. Further on the prose says "The effective range proved to be only 1,530 nmi (2,830 km; 1,760 mi) at 19 knots". AustralianRupert (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- "She was rammed by a Norwegian freighter in Tromsø on 12 October". Do we know if this was an accident, or deliberate?
- Clarified.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- No issues.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- No issues.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
- a (tagged and captioned):
- The current image used in the article is of the ship's sister. That is no drama as it serves a purpose, but obviously not ideal. I wonder if it would be possible to replace it with one of the actual ship itself. I found some in this search (some excellent ones, including a depiction of the ship's final moments - copyrighted though). I'm not sure if any of them can be used, but please take a look and let me know. [5]
- I've replaced the fair use image with a painting that was on Commons. I'm sorry I didn't find this before (in fact I found it by accident when I clicked on the Battle of the Barents Sea article). I've removed the fair use one because I figure that it is not really possible to make a legit fair use claim if there is one with an OTRS ticket. Please let me know what you think. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Just a couple of minor things to tweak or discuss. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for budding in, according to HRS volume 3 page 153 the coordinates are 77°19' north 30°47' east. MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, added.--Sturmvogel 66 00:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have passed the article now. Thanks Sturm and MisterBee. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)