Talk:Get It Done

Television: Buffyverse / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Buffyverse task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes

Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.

________________________________________________________

Criticism?

Should a Criticism section be added? As Nalvage and Anonymous (below) have pointed out, there are parts of this article that shouldn't be there, but I do not think they should all go. So, I suggest making a Criticism(s?) section, and adding the most noteworthy... issues, there. --Gero 04:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is in deciding which, if any, criticisms are noteworthy. People will have a whole host of different subjective opinions about this episode and this season, and there's a danger of getting into "Some/Many fans think..." which is against Wikipedia's policy on unsourced Weasel Words. Which fans have these critical opinions? When were they expressed? What exactly did they say? Why is their opinion noteworthy? How many of them are there? What percentage of the viewership? Without reliable sources you fall into the trap of, "Well, I've seen a lot of criticism online..." which, to me, seems too vague for an encyclopaedia. My feeling is that Wikipedia should avoid talking about a show's quality (either good or bad) unless there's something verifiable that can be pointed to, like ratings, or awards, or quotes from those working on the show etc.--Nalvage 13:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know I've seen some articles around (one in a magazine, a couple online) that talk about and criticize the many deus ex machina used in the final episodes, and how some of the characters would be simply knocked out if they would have gotten in the way of a scene. (Willow, with her magic recently of course, but it happened to Giles most of all. The writers even included him saying, 'At least I wasn't knocked out', once.) I'll try and find some links. And I know a quote can be found somewhere with Sarah Michelle Gellar talking about how Buffy felt like a different person the last two seasons, and was unhappy about it. --Gero 22:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Giles' Absence

Does anyone know why Giles wasn't in this episode? Was Anthony Stewart Head busy with something else, or is Giles' absence an explanation for the new Potentials that show up later? Like he was out gathering them. --Gero 16:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think story-wise during this time Giles is travelling and collecting potentials. In real life I think he was only a recurring guest star in series 7, rather than a regular, because he needed more time with his family who lived in england. -- Paxomen 17:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Willow Drains Power

"When Willow needs energy, she takes it from Kennedy and Anya. However, Anya is human again, and so it would seem more likely that Xander would be the strongest person there after Kennedy."

I dont agree with this, because even as a human, Anya is still a more than capable magic user.

And to be honest, this entire article is has a very bitter tone and needs to be made a bit more neutral.

-I have to second that, but I think it would be hard finding someone with a neutral stance that could rewrite this well. That's goes for most of the last season as well it seems. --Gero 15:59, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Writing And Acting Section

The writing and acting section of this article was full of vague opinions and contradictory insults. I deleted it. Lots42 14:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I Did

For the record: I nuked the trivia for being trivia and the expanded overview for violating copyright. Lots42 (talk) 10:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy715.jpg

Image:Buffy715.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Friend

The recently added bit about Anya and Buffy's friendship confuses me; it smells of original research which isn't valid for Wikipedia. Lots42 (talk) 18:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jawohl and Nazi reference

The German version put "Zu Befehl" changing "Jawohl" from the original. It's true that "Zu Befehl" has no Nazi-connotation (or almost any) but the alternative "Jawohl!" wouldn't, either, since it's still used without any reference to Nazi ideology (mostly in tongue-in-cheek use). Still, blind obedience is transported by "Jawohl!", which could be roughly translated as "How high?". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.177.121.18 (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with on minor adjustment: "Jawohl!" in military jargon essentially means just "Yes Sir!" as is "Zu Befehl!" the literal translation of which "As ordered." "Jawohl" is kind of archaic (being of middle high german origin) and was thus used well before the 20th Century and is still in use today as a stronger form of agreement or to stress a point, not necessarily in a military context. Maybe that's the reason the translators changed it to "Zu Befehl!" Dekar1241 (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow Figures

I'm wondering if anyone has any information on those shadow figures (from the emergancy bag). Are these things real, as in was it invented for the show or is it something that really would be been used in Africa/anywhere? Drewder (talk) 03:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]