Talk:Get Lifted

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube links

I think the links to the clips of his singles on YouTube at the bottom of the page clearly violate copyright, and should therefore be removed. Any thoughts about this? Salaskan 17:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:John legend-get lifted.jpg

Image:John legend-get lifted.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Get Lifted. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Get Lifted

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Get Lifted's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "RIAA":

From Kanye West singles discography: "Gold & Platinum: Kanye West". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
From Kanye West: "Searchable Database". Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). Search: Kanye West. Retrieved February 18, 2012.
From Lauryn Hill discography: "Gold & Platinum: Nas". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved May 7, 2012.
From John Legend discography: "Gold & Platinum – RIAA". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
From John Legend: "Gold & Platinum Searchable Database – August 09, 2014". RIAA. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
From List of music recording certifications: "RIAA – Recording Industry Association of America". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
From Alicia Keys: "RIAA – Gold & Platinum". RIAA. Archived from the original on August 7, 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2009.
From Snoop Dogg discography: "Gold & Platinum: Snoop Dogg". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved September 11, 2020.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]