Talk:Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

India: Delhi / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sources

This story does not cite any individual sources. Also, speculative sentences such as, "brave men", etc. should be avoided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hijinxs1 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Do you think they mean Delhi Sultanate? --Wetman 6 July 2005 07:55 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

his mother was jat king daughter

why this fact has been excluded that he is born of a jat lady, so many references are available. seems some hidden propaganda of jat boys who continuously try to hide the truth, not only this their were akbari and jehangiri jats all give their daughters122.161.78.118 (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only Ferishta says this, and he is not a contemporary source. He wrote this centuries after. OperativePhase33 (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Native (Possibly Jatt) Origin?

We should consider that the sources by Ibn Battuta and Afif were composed after the dynasty established a source of “Islamic” political legitimacy (usually meaning attaching themselves to foreign ancestry).

Meanwhile, the source from the beginning of the dynasty (a quote from Ghazi Malik, who would be more preoccupied with consolidating actual control than spinning a narrative) only says he is of no noble origins ("awara mard").

While, yes, you are right to argue that this doesn’t point to Jatt origins, it’s worth asking why a nobody would garner so much support from the Jatts of the Punjab? Why would the local chiefs marry their daughters to a random immigrant? I’m sure a foreigner could learn to love Depalpur, but why would the local Jatts flock to his banner?

We know that fabricated (or in this case, vague) ancestral claims were done the world over.

Look at the ("Arab") Sayyid dynasty, who were likely Bhatti Rajputs or Khokhars. Or the ("Afghan") Gujarati Muzaffarids, who were likely Khatris or Tankas. Or the ("Sayyid") Mysore Sultans, who literally had contemporary sources mention their Sipra Jatt origins, but still allowed narratives of Arab ancestry to be spread around.

That’s why people take Amir Khusrau’s vagueness to imply Jatt origins. OperativePhase33 (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]