Talk:Ghost craters on Mercury

A fact from Ghost craters on Mercury appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that ghost craters on Mercury contain both graben and wrinkle ridges?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ghost craters on Mercury.

Wikipedia

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Suggestions from Orlando Guerra

I think you have a great page. Good job. Some suggestions: [1.] I would work on your intro a little. I think the first sentence should emphasize your main topic, which is tectonics on Mercury; [2.] In the picture captions instead of just putting their names maybe you should have a short description of what they are, such as a picture of wrinkle ridges; [3.] Also you may want to link some of your terms to their corresponding wiki page so that people can look them up. This is a great start.

Suggestions Pt. 2

Im assuming you adjusted your topic from tectonics on Mercury to ghost craters? If so everything looked pretty good. The only thing that got me was the term ghost craters. I was really interested when I heard the name and was very curious about it, but you didn't talk much about the name itself. Is it termed that just because of the particular tectonics involved or is it just the name given to lunar maria on mercury? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oguerr1 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions From Kohl

David, I think the page is overall structured well. The intro paragraph could be slightly longer. I also agree with Orlando in that the image would be best suited with a description. Lastly, in the paragraph under ghost craters there could be a little more elaboration on each type of crater.unsigned comment added by Kkoppe2 (talk • contribs), 8 April 2014 (UTC)