Talk:Giant cell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 27 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ikeshammah.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Class project[edit]

I am improving the Giant Cell page for a class project under the supervision of Mr. Travis Bohrer (User:tbohrer74) at Waynesville High School.EbonySjones (talk) 14:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The way the article addresses the reader seems to be inappropriate for Wikipedia. 59.10.72.121 (talk) 11:56, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, I'm unable to find a user page for either tbohrer74 or EbonySjones to add comments on their talk page.Wzrd1 (talk) 03:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's because neither of those pages has ever been edited. You can create the talk page by editing it if you want to, but the chances of getting a response are not all that high. Looie496 (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement[edit]

Inline citations for various symptoms, types of giant cells, etc. Not directly addressing the reader, such as "you may go blind", instead, something similar to "untreated, the condition may result in blindness". You can also seek help from various Wikipedia medicine or Wikipedia biology editors, many of who are professionals in medicine or biology.Wzrd1 (talk) 03:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should it cover tumor giant cells[edit]

Clear-cell sarcoma mentions tumor giant cells - Should they be covered here ? or where ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giant cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tags?[edit]

I'm wondering whether the tags are still relevant?

  1. There are now 18 medical references, so is that complaint addressed now?
  2. Similarly, the section tag inMultinucleated giant cells in COVID-19 patients seems obsolete, since there are now several reputable medical citations?
  3. The Tone tag was placed five and a half years ago, and the article does not now seem obviously non-encyclopedic. Is this still required? DaveApter (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since there have been no objections, I am removing the tags now. DaveApter (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]