Jump to content

Talk:Giants–Jets rivalry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page name?

[edit]

I originally named this page "Jets-Giants" because more sources listed the Jets first. Is it the standard naming procedure for Wikipedia to use the oldest team first or list them alphabetically? Otherwise, I think we should go with what the sources use. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In my reading (which includes extensive reading of local NY area newspapers as I live in New Jersey), wether the Jets or Giants are listed first is a 50-50 toss-up, which may be influenced by page layout as much as anything. It seems to me, to be neutral, we should go with alphabetical order for all such rivalry articles; alphabetical order is a neutral, arbitrary order that shows no favoritism one way or the other.
On a broader note, however, I do believe we should, nay must include the full names of the teams. Wikipedia is written for a worldwide audience, and including city names is a simple way to make clear what these articles are discussing for those less familiar with North American sports teams.
And we should also take special care to only include such articles when there actually is sufficient material to support a separate article. Even this rivalry, which is infrequent outside the preseason, could probably be sufficiently covered at the rivalry sections of the team's respective articles with substantially similar wording. In other words, I don't really know if this article is even needed; just because a rivalry gets mentioned at the teams' articles doesn't mean it's in need of it's own article. oknazevad (talk) 17:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Giants–Jets rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]