This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire articles
Is this box necessary or useful? All the information in it is contained in the infobox at the top and again in the template below.
It is not separated from the References section but does not sit well there. However, it does not merit a new section
Can we just get rid of it? Doug (at Wiki) 00:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I like them not so much for these "single episopacy" bishops, but for those that held more than one office - they make navigating through the various bishops when I'm doing maitenance much much much easier. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I won't remove it but can you find a way of making it a bit more separate from the "References". It looks wrong there. Can we get a separator line across? Doug (at Wiki) 13:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Like I've done! Doug (at Wiki) 13:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
