Talk:Gintoki Sakata

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Reviewers comments

I rated "Coverage and accuracy" as failed because the article lacks a few sections common to pages of this kind, namely "Personality" and "Appearances in other media". But all in all, this looks like a promiseing article. It is among the best that I've found so far among the unrated anime articles. -- Goodraise (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of had a bad time with creating articles on Wiki that I'm actually surprised I'm getting good word on something. Probably it's hard for me to create a good Wiki article and I know some of what you're looking for will probably be tough to find (the only "other media" I can think of for Gintoki are Jump-related things such as the JSS/JUS video games and some of the stuff I mentioned in the article with Ichigo Kurosaki from Bleach...though personality should be easy) but I will try my best. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles is easy. Creating good articles is hard work. And it is appreciated. Keep up the good work. :) -- Goodraise (talk) 23:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you want me to review the article again (for example if you think one of the B-class criteria has been met), just drop me a line on my talk page...

Sakamoto?

It's obvious that Gin, Katsura and Takasugi were in the same class together and worked in the Joi. But I'm not sure about Sakamoto: sure he was a member of the Joi and had a flashback from that period, but that seemed to be it. There really was no hint of Gin knowing of Sakamoto prior to the Joi from what I've seen. -StrangerAtaru (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

Himura Kenshin and other swordsmen characters who have their own arcticles have Abilities, Personality, Plot sections. Why doesn't Gintoki have them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurprica (talk • contribs) 09:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't the edit summaries explain that? The manual of style states this types of sections should be avoided per Wikipedia:Fancruft, besides there was very little about Gintoki's abilities.Tintor2 (talk) 11:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gintoki Sakata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722011803/http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/gintamawiibanjiokuchuubu/index.html?tag=result;title;4 to http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/gintamawiibanjiokuchuubu/index.html?tag=result;title;4
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ganbarion.co.jp/game/jss/g_jss_page.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ganbarion.co.jp/game/jus/g_jus_page.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sunrise-inc.co.jp/gintama/products/p_zacca_card_b03.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sunrise-inc.co.jp/gintama/products/p_zacca_cap.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]