Talk:GioGio's Bizarre Adventure/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review will commence: soon. Cognissonance (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Found no flaws with this one.
Pass/Fail:
@IDV: Cognissonance (talk) 08:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cognissonance: Thanks! In case you were wondering, I cited that EW source because of "re-creates the look and feel of its source material with exacting detail", but sure, it's not as directly about visuals as some other of the refs.--IDV^talk 08:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@IDV: Took me another look to find it. I wasn't sure if it was praise or simply objective description, but it works. Cognissonance (talk) 08:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]