Talk:Girl in Mirror

Girl in Mirror has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 19, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Roy Lichtenstein's pop art painting Girl in Mirror is the subject of a 2012 sale without consent and fraud lawsuit?

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Girl in Mirror/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is a bit short. Can't it be expanded on further?
- I tried to expand.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Analysis --> Don't see a need to have two paragraphs, they can fit in one.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Critical review --> Retitle to Reception and same issue as above.
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see no other issues with the article. It is well referenced and written.

Y All issues addressed. Passing the article. Statυs (talk) 07:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]