Talk:Glacial Lake Missoula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Glacial Lake Duluth - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 04:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The move has been carried out.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Missoula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Lake Missoula?[edit]

The map of Montana given in this article depicts the physical landscape of the State, but specifically excludes a cartographical description of Lake Missoula itself. Might not this glaring omission be rectified? Nuttyskin (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a sentence[edit]

This is not a sentence. Please fix and clarify as well. "No evidence of large mammals, i.e.; mammoths, mastodons and bison may have roamed nearby, there is no evidence that these animals nor of human beings in the area." 2601:600:877F:7D0:182:96C8:BDEA:FAB6 (talk) 19:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I made an attempt to rewrite the grabled text. Also, a funny feeling and vauge memories of a recent paper that I once read tells me to fact check the sentence about lack of associated large mammal fossils by looking at the paper again. Paul H. (talk) 00:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additional note: False alarm. The Mammoth site that I was thinking is associated with the slackwater lake deposits of Glacial Lake Lewis instead of Glacial lake Missoula. Thus, no corrections are needed. For additional details, search for the Coyote Canyon Mammoth Site in Benton County, Washington. An example:
Last, G.V. and Rittenour, T.M., 2021. Chronology of Missoula Flood Deposits at the Coyote Canyon Mammoth Site, Washington State, USA. Quaternary, 4(3), 20 pp.
and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2007. An ancient bathtub ring of mammoth fossils (2007, May 7) retrieved 27 April 2024 Paul H. (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]