Talk:Glycocalyx

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

Should the link to a band (23:glycocalyx) really be in an informational article about a cellular comformation? 85.165.151.186 11:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

glycocalyx

I am improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username:LTEMESV) at Clemson University.

Egarifa (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Elena Garifallou (EGARIFA)[reply]

I disagree, the pages should remain separate

i agree. pages should be

i also agree .. its the same

I also agree - a capsule is a type of glycocalyx layer

I also agree -- the four-legged animals/horses thing. But "extra cellular" in the definition should be "extracellular" Richard8081 03:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I meant that the articles Glycocalyx and Capsule should be/remain separate (whether that's agreeing or not) Richard8081 03:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glycocalix hence redirected to Glycocalyx. Rashad9607 16:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that the Glycocalyx page should be merged with the Capsule (microbiology) page. A capsule is one type of glycocalyx layer, yes, but a glycocalyx layer is not a type of capsule. That is, bacteria have a glycocalyx layer which is called a capsule: but there are other types of glycocalyx layers, as the article notes, which are not bacterial capsules. Human red blood cells, for example, have a glycocalyx. Many of the relevant topics are discussed in the article itself, but a quick search of Pubmed for "glycocalyx" will produce many articles which also underscore this fact. RMADLA 00:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The pages should remain as is. Glycocalyx has different functions in different in different organisms. There should be different linked pages for each of the uses. The wiki format is best as a splitter of info, not lumping it.

I agree, very useful to have one brief page that contains the rundown of all of the uses of glycocalyx without merging in more detailled discussion. For example I came here for info on function in the brush boundary of the small intestine. This small but important bit of info would be obscured if lumped into same article as capsule. Jklemens 04:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The two pages should not be merged as i think the glycocalyx page is messy enough. The capsule contains the glycocalyx but also other compounds as well

quick definition

This article along with many others is missing one key component, a short and quick definition. As someone whom uses the site frequently, it can be annoying to have to research specific parts of a definition to either understand it (i.e. medical terminology) or just too simple be able to get a general idea of what is being described. For someone who has no insight into biology it would be difficult to learn research or study any part of when the simplest definitions are above them. I would suggest adding a simplified summary to this and every other section to enable fast, general research.

74.106.156.238 20:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Quick Definition20:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glycocalyx in Digestive System

I do not understand how glycocalyx (which is on the outside of the mucosal cells) assists in the absorption of nutrients into the gastric cells. I understand the idea behind both Villi and Microvilli increasing the surface area of the Small Intestine, but how does glycocalyx do this? Getting to the root of my issue, there are no direct citations or links to the digestive section that allow someone to easily find a more indepth explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnrubenstein (talk • contribs) 21:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glycocalyx. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203204157/http://www.biophysj.org/cgi/reprint/85/1/637 to http://www.biophysj.org/cgi/reprint/85/1/637

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]