Talk:Godhra train burning

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Godhra train burning article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

A news item involving Godhra train burning was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 February 2011.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 27, 2012, February 27, 2015, February 27, 2017, February 27, 2020, February 27, 2022, and February 27, 2023.

India: Gujarat Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Mid-importance).

Terrorism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a biased article that contradicts the court judgement[edit]

The courts have ruled with smple evidence that this was an act of arson. The article is lying and biased about it and cannot be trusted. 2409:40C4:2A:24D7:18BB:F637:408D:CFBD (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our policies on maintaining a Neutral point of view require us to summarize what reliable sources say, not what the courts say. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at some of the sources there do seem to be confessions that explain how access could have been gained to the rear coach. I think the OP, while perhaps not expressing it in a suitable way, has a point. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]