Jump to content

Talk:Gogyo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Definition between Godai and Gogyo.

[edit]

Hello I will be elaborating on The history of Gogyo in Japan. Including the difference between Gogyo and Godai with their religious influences. Zongqi (talk) 03:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/991896114 The reason was that it was not in the article that was linked article, please find attached article, in the lead is the Gogyo. Thanks. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shinto#:~:text=Shinto%20(Japanese%3A%20%E7%A5%9E%E9%81%93)%2C,and%20as%20a%20nature%20religion Zongqi (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Wuxing

[edit]

Poorly written article, with odd phrasing and capitalization (why is "Five" capitalized but "elements" isn't?), misspellings, and dubious romanizations. Does not provide any more worthwhile insight other than where the theory was transmitted from (how about more information on what this theory is really about, what makes it sufficiently distinctive from Wuxing for it to merit its own article?). Justified with irrelevant/unreliable sources such as reverso (a dictionary, that at best could provide a romanization) and an obscure website with "wiki" in its name. Ridiculous claim that this merely "relates" to Wuxing, because it's most likely DERIVES from Wuxing. Finally, the Japanese Wikipedia does not feel the need to split, so what's with this weird obsession on the English side?Mazamadao (talk) 03:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been almost entirely written by serial sockpuppet Zongqi (under both that user account and the Dorthyyellow account), who has been banned for persistent disruptive editing. Zongqi had a habit of using sources that were non-reliable or pushing fringe views at odds with what reliable sources claim. They also had a tendency of adding sources as citations that do not actually support the claims that Zongqi was making. That being the case, the sources used in this article need to be examined closely. If we lack good reliable sources on which to build an article on Gogyo, I would support Mazamadao's suggestion that we merge this into the Wuxing article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And Zongqi is (surprise surprise) now back, trying to restore all their poorly written and incorrectly referenced text using the newly created account Winterlighter. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be an investigation into the hounding,lynching and assumptions that are being made here.You have been deleting edits and deliberately not reading the information provided in citations. The fact that gogyo is in Japanese medicine is well known in the field of study. Not to be rude as you seem to be a very accomplished editor on this platform but because your lack of knowledge on this subject, I think you are really making some assumptions that are not very well informed and consequently interfering with the development of Wikipedia by deleting this page. As I can see through the page history there have been other editors contributions here also. Winterlighter (talk) 22:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia due to your persistently disruptive behavior - your ludicrous claim that by reverting your edits, other editors are "lynching" you is an example of that (and is a claim that many people would find grossly offensive, given the connotations of that term). I know you appear to regard yourself as an expert on Gogyo and related concepts of Japanese culture but the fact is that your edits are not constructive; you constantly misuse sources to support claims that you want to make. (Some of the claims that you have made, such as the idea that Gogyo lies at the conceptual heart of Shinto, seem highly dubious too). The fact that you are repeatedly creating sockpuppets just shows that you do not respect the fact that you have been blocked and asked not to edit anymore. All of the sockpuppet accounts you create will be identified and blocked; all of the edits you make using them will be reversed. You are wasting your own time as well as that of other editors. Midnightblueowl (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]